Client Login
Showing posts with label Higher Education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Higher Education. Show all posts

Monday, May 5, 2014

Client Story: York College of Pennsylvania

Since opening its doors in 1787, York College of Pennsylvania has maintained a sterling reputation as a “center of affordable academic excellence.”

But in 2010, after more than two centuries of distinction, the College decided that one thing needed to change: its performance review process.
 
Reviewsnap Performance Management System - Higher Education Case StudyIts legacy process—labor-intensive and spreadsheet-driven—was no longer keeping pace with the needs of its busy staff and employees. The paperwork alone was causing delays and frustration for everyone involved, said Vicki Stewart, the College’s Director of Human Resources. The time for change had come.

Click here to download our most recent case study and learn more about the benefits York College of Pennsylvania has
experienced with Reviewsnap.

Monday, August 5, 2013

Higher Education: Get Faculty Engaged in Performance Reviews


Engaging college and university faculty in the performance review process is a unique challenge. But that doesn’t mean you have to fail at it. A few best practices targeted at academia can solve the problem and engage college faculty in the performance review process.

First, it’s important to understand why higher education faculty members are less likely than campus staff employees to see the value of performance reviews.

·       Faculty may have a professional bias against performance reviews, feeling that the entire concept of job assessments and performance reviews has no place in the world of academia.
·       Faculty may believe that end-of-term satisfaction surveys answered by students are a sufficient gauge of their performance.
·       Attitudes and beliefs about tenure — and rules that apply to tenured faculty — may prejudice faculty against performance assessments.
·       Faculty may believe they are actually over-scrutinized, and unfairly at best, thanks to myriad student media and rating websites (e.g., ratemyprofessors.com, rateyourprof.com, and myedu.com).
·       Finally, faculty — not unlike many staff employees — may feel the review process is too much of an interruption to their school year and occurs at no good time.

As Jeffrey L. Buller writes in his book Best Practices in Faculty Evaluation, “It’s not at all uncommon for faculty members to ask, ‘Why do we have to do assessments? We already assess our students in class every time we determine their grades.’ Or, ‘Why do we have to do program review? We already do assessment.’”

Applying a handful of best practices can go a long way toward getting faculty to appreciate the value of a robust and productive performance review process.

Be specific with your language. “Needs improvement” may be clearly understood by an administrative staffer who has very specific, concrete job requirements. But that assessment is likely to be far too vague to a faculty member who works in the more subjective, less well-defined world of the lecture hall.

Customize goals and competencies. Make performance expectations for faculty members align with the roles they perform as educators. Off-the-shelf goals and competencies are unlikely to create engagement and, at worst, will cause faculty to believe university leadership simply doesn’t understand them.
Get faculty feedback before finalizing goals and competencies. Don’t assume that the competencies and goals you’ve developed for faculty are as specific and appropriately customized as necessary. Asking faculty for feedback during the development process can improve assessments and heighten faculty engagement.
You can learn about these best practices in more detail in our brief “Customizing Performance Reviews for Higher Education.”

Monday, June 3, 2013

Performance Review Automation: Even Innovative Higher Ed Institutions Need the Basics


Today’s universities lead innovative research programs — developing robots, curing diseases, and finding alternate fuel sources. In contrast to these cutting-edge endeavors is the fact that the
university probably runs on antiquated internal management systems.

The danger in an antiquated system, for any business process, is that information accuracy becomes compromised. The system might not have been configured for the higher education environment. Updates might never have been installed. And user adoption could be low, raising the administrative responsibility of system owners and primary users.

Updating system automation doesn’t have to be a massive overhaul. In particular, performance management systems might be one of the easiest to move from manual, paper-based processes to an online system.

Higher education institutions achieve three things with automation:
1.     Increased user adoption: SaaS systems make it easy for individuals to manage their own information, rate their own performance, maintain their goals, and even provide feedback to other employees.
2.     Reduced costs: While the upfront cost of a system upgrade or installation might hurt the budget, over the long run, universities can save money on administration and paper management. Additionally, everyone saves time because it's clear who’s filled out their reviews and who’s behind. System notifications are a faster way to communicate than chasing down every staff and faculty member’s review.
3.     Flexibility: Performance management has to be meaningful for employees in order to really have an impact. Customizing the competencies is another easy way to make sure that, say, an aerodynamics professor and the undergraduate admissions director are getting the same performance management.

Look into systems such as Reviewsnap when it's time to upgrade your performance management solution. Find a provider that understands the challenges of a higher education institution and can help get the most value from the solution.

Monday, April 29, 2013

Customizing Performance Reviews for Higher Education

Faculty and staff populations at universities are filled with people who have been doing the same thing for many years, as well as new employees trying to find the best ways to be productive on small budgets. The performance review can seem like an interruption when people have other priorities.

Instead, universities can embrace their learning culture with Reviewsnap and make the performance review an opportunity for development.  

Download “Customizing Performance Reviews for Higher Education: Make Performance ManagementMeaningful for Faculty and Staff” so you can see how universities can get more out of the performance review process.

In this brief, you’ll learn how to customize reviews to make the process more meaningful by:
  • Changing the language
  • Defining the goals 
  • Asking for clarity
Download the brief and see how customizing goals and competencies can make the performance review process worthwhile.

Get started with Reviewsnap

Watch Video Demo
Request Live Demo
Free Trial Signup

Connect with us!

Reviewsnap Headquarters Reviewsnap is headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, and is a division of Applied Training Systems Inc., founded in 1995.
MENU