Narrowing Skill Gaps for Employees

The employee without skill gaps is somewhat unusual. Sure there are superstars with few, if any, performance issues, but those are few and far between. Performance management should include not only the recognition of the gaps, but a plan to help close them.

Achieving desired performance outcomes is at least partially achieved through accurate identification of performance gaps and the application of appropriate training and development to reduce or eliminate the gaps. Effective performance management processes include both of these important elements.

When effective mapping of learning content to competency gaps is part of the performance management "infrastructure" in an organization, performance gaps tend to close faster and more completely. This stems from the fact that there is a much higher level of matching training and development efforts to areas where employees are weakest and need the most attention. Without this level of mapping there is usually a shotgun approach to training and development efforts.

ASTD reports that "Organizations are linking learning to performance and the bottom line, and they understand the relationship between creating a skilled workforce and achieving enterprise-wide success." The linkage between performance, learning, and higher levels of profitability is difficult to deny. Intuitively we would expect there to be a higher level of success and much less waste in the training process if attention is focused on closing performance gaps rather than painting employees with a broad development brush.

Training for the sake of training alone is a very bad idea and consumes valuable cash that can be applied more appropriately elsewhere. But when training is specifically linked to performance, training expenditures that are essentially thrown out the window are reduced dramatically.

Reviewsnap’s Latest White Paper Helps Your Company Move Ahead with Performance Management — Without Any Dread!

Reviewsnap, the leading cloud-based performance management software solution, today released its new white paper, “From Dread to Moving Ahead — Take the Pain Out of Performance Management.” Download a complimentary copy now.

Cue the shaking of heads, the rolling of eyes, and the murmurs of “not again” heard up and down the office corridors. How could a process so ingrained in organizational culture cause so much anxiety? Simple. By emphasizing form over function and process over performance acceleration. Too often, activities focus on compliance rather than creating lasting value for the organization and its people.

An effective performance management strategy can set the stage for a high-performance culture. Discover how to create a results-oriented performance management process that will advance your organization’s position in the market while also nurturing your best and brightest talent when you download your complimentary copy of Reviewsnap’s new white paper, “From Dread to Moving Ahead — Take the Pain Out of Performance Management.”.

“It’s time to take a deeper look into performance management,” said Chris Arringdale, Reviewsnap’s vice president of marketing. “Organizations that are serious about moving their businesses forward should stop thinking of performance management as an ‘annual event’ and instead create a process of continual improvement using ongoing goal setting, coaching and feedback. This agile model of performance management helps to keep everyone on track and moving in the right direction.”

When you download Reviewsnap’s new white paper, you’ll learn valuable tips and best practices that will help your company:

• Determine organizational readiness for performance management
• Establish a culture of performance
• Use goal-setting, coaching and feedback to drive engagement and results

Drop the dreadful process of once-a-year, paper-based performance appraisals and start using these best practices to help your organization move ahead. An effective performance management process is a proven solution for getting the highest possible return on the company’s greatest asset — its people.

Calibrating Performance Appraisals

Calibration, according to Webster's Dictionary, is a set of graduations to indicate values or positions. In the realm of performance management, calibration can be important to getting performance appraisals as accurate as possible by introducing graduated review of the performance appraisal to help ensure it is as accurate as possible.

Because of inherent individualized bias that we all tend to have when it comes to how we perceive the behavior and performance of those who work for us, having a process in place where others are allowed to review the ratings, comments, goals and development plans for employees will generally yield better performance appraisals. Yes, there are new biases introduced into this process, but by inserting multiple people into the performance review process, there is opportunity for new perspectives and for alternative views to help create an appraisal that is reflective of the employee's performance.

The process of having other individuals or groups review appraisals is the basis for performance management calibration. In a recent SHRM study, fifty-four percent of HR professionals who responded said their organizations conduct some form of calibration and 35 percent said ratings were changed as a result of the calibration process.

With more than one-third of the appraisals being changed in some manner, it is likely that the quality of performance appraisals is enhanced on an overall basis. That is a significant quality assurance process that is lacking in many organizations.

Some calibration processes involve a simple escalation from the manager to his or her manager for review of the appraisal. Others are more stout in that they involve a group that is responsible for looking appraisals over and working closely with the manager in refining appraisals.

It's important that the process be kept agile and to not involve too many people. By doing so, you can help avoid paralysis by analysis. A performance management calibration process is intended to be a quality assurance measure and not a means by which criticism is levied against the manager.

Calibration generally involves other managers, supervisors or team leads who have a fair amount of knowledge about the employee in question. The preference is that they be in a position to provide input based on some level of first-hand experience working with the employee.

There are some organizations, however, that will place an individual with little or no knowledge of the employee's work or workplace behavior into the group reviews. The thinking here is that that individual can ask appropriate questions and take an unbiased view of how the appraisal is being conducted. What they can't offer though is any substantive input on the performance of the employee. But, if performance notes (journal entries) have been used extensively throughout any given appraisal period, that individual will have a fair amount of information to use as a basis for discussing the employee's appraisal.

Having some sort of calibration laid over the top of the performance management process is something most organizations should consider. From a morale perspective, employees will feel better knowing that more care has been taken to complete their appraisals.