LinkedIn’s Talent Blog recently offered a highly educational
infographic, Why More Employees Are Considering Leaving
Their Companies.
The infographic contains a variety of useful insights and
data—but one of the key story lines is this:
LinkedIn surveyed employed individuals
worldwide, asking what would convince them to leave their employer; their top
response was “better compensation and benefits.” LinkedIn also surveyed
employees who had actually changed jobs recently, asking what convinced them to
change employers; their top response was “greater opportunities for
advancement.”
Given the reality of why people
left their employers, LinkedIn wondered whether organizations have failed to
create sufficient internal mobility programs—programs that would have kept
people from jumping ship. But further research showed the existence of “well-defined
internal mobility programs” throughout a large majority of companies in the
U.S., Canada, India, Britain and Australia.
So what’s behind this discrepancy? The LinkedIn infographic
states, “According to our Exit Survey, HR and talent acquisition professionals
overestimate employee awareness of their internal mobility programs by more
than 2X … Plus, 69% of British and Indian, 68% of American and Canadian and 60%
of Australian Exit Survey respondents said it was easier to find an open
position outside rather than inside their previous company.”
That’s utterly terrible news.
Yes, “preventable turnover” happens. But it shouldn’t happen because employees aren’t
aware of internal mobility options. What makes this situation especially
deplorable is that we have a mechanism in place to continually remind employees
about internal mobility and job openings: our performance review process.
Sadly, too many performance reviews skip right past internal
career pathing. Reviews focus on performance gaps and targets—and little else. This
has to change.
The cost of employees jumping ship (especially good
employees) is far too great. As the LinkedIn infographic shows, the annual
savings from a mere 1% reduction in preventable turnover would be $7.5 million
for an employer in the U.S.

No comments:
Post a Comment